(July 7, 2014 at 11:35 am)SteveII Wrote: Blackout--Regarding #2 God Exists, I was pointing out that using miracles as an argument that science has disproven the Bible is not a good argument, because I could posit that God exists.
Regarding the actual premise, the existence of God seems more plausible that the negative.
There is not scientific evidence that the human mind can stand in causal relationship to a natural event. Complete randomness would not be immune to the laws of nature.
Again the Post Hoc fallacy, if the universe is random or not we do not know, however assuming it as god that created the first causal relationship is fallacious
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you
