RE: The Long and the Short of it.
May 19, 2010 at 4:44 am
(This post was last modified: May 19, 2010 at 4:45 am by fr0d0.)
(May 18, 2010 at 6:31 pm)Paul the Human Wrote: Really, fr0d0? Silly word games? It would be illogical to say that a lack of evidence to support the claim that god exists proves that he does not. It is not illogical to admit that the evidence points to answers other than god and decide that 'god' is the least likely thing to exist according to the known laws of the universe.Indeed it isn't illogical to suggest that material evidence should lead you to make scientific claims. I do it myself. What people here are suggesting though... is that this has any bearing on a belief in God. THAT is totally fallacious, ergo illogical. No word games here - just fact.
An argument about logic. Heheh! From the guy who says, "God just is." The irony is not lost on me. Good show!
"God just is" is a logical proposition. Mock it all you like. Call me when you think of anything worthwhile to say about it

(May 18, 2010 at 8:34 pm)padraic Wrote: I try to refrain from ad hominem attacks unless attacked first. On this occasion,you attacked me first.Not believing in turning the other cheek,I hit back.I was correct then. Note I didn't ad hominem you at all. I pointed out the flaw in your reasoning. I notice you don't address that.