RE: Nuclear Iran a bigger threat than ISIS
July 21, 2014 at 4:59 pm
(This post was last modified: July 21, 2014 at 5:04 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(July 21, 2014 at 1:45 pm)Ryantology (╯°◊°)╯︵ ══╬ Wrote: Our political leaders use religion to get the uneducated poor to hate Middle Eastern countries.
Mostly it is our religious opportunisys who are using uneducated poor try to dictate to our political opportunists.
(July 21, 2014 at 2:56 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: Is it really prudence to attack Middle Eastern states to stop them from getting the bomb? To trade guaranteed lives lost for possible lives lost? If we could wave a magic want and keep Iran from ever getting nukes, I would advise it. However, we don't have any magic wands, all we have is human means, and they all involve trade-offs. If we want to keep nukes out of the hands of a state determined to get them, there's no way it doesn't cost us dearly.
Actually, I think it would be not be a bad move to ignore the bleeting of the Likud and allow Iran to equip itself with nuclear weapons, and allow Saudi Arabia to possess a de facto nuclear capability through an agreement with Pakistan. They will neutralize each other.
