The redneck strike again.

[Little Rik]

1) I didn't say all your arguments are illogical. I said you make so many illogical arguments that nobody will appreciate the few good ideas you have.

I got a different story Ben.
If people would consider most of my argument illogical they would come up with a counter argument that would knock down my idea.
I found very very rare that they are able to do so.
I admit that in some instance i was wrong but most of the time i am not which means that rather than my argument being illogical they just go against their belief and for this reason only they think that i am wrong.

2) You haven't defined God, or the evidence for God, or explained why the evidence is sufficient to prove that God exists. People have experiences of God all the time, but that only proves that people have the capacity for religious experience-- it doesn't demonstrate that their interpretation of the experience (i.e. they think God has revealed himself) represents reality. Seeing is believing, but believing is not necessarily being right.

Many people get excited in the hope that something in their dreams is true or is going to materialize.
Most of the time the dream and faith slowly disappear as the reality say NO.
It is when the enthusiasm and the reality become one that you realize that you are correct.
How can you define God when you realize that God is within?
As the consciousness that God is within grow you become more and more aware of who you really are but again how would you explain externally?
It is already difficult to explain the excitement that you feel physically speaking when you are in love with someone so to explain spiritual love is even more difficult.
Maybe in the future the technology may be able to invent a machine that is able to look within and explain the role of the pineal gland.
At the moment the only way is the hard way which goes like this..........desire for it.....ideation that everything and everybody is his creation and adjusting our life so to be in tune with spiritual evolution.