(July 26, 2014 at 9:06 am)whateverist Wrote:(July 26, 2014 at 8:43 am)Riketto Wrote: I admit that in some instance i was wrong but most of the time i am not which means that rather than my argument being illogical they just go against their belief and for this reason only they think that i am wrong.
Funny how it goes. I was just thinking about your intuitional science and wondering how useful and reliable you find it to be, and then you write this. We may be the same species after all.
Specifically, I was wondering if you thought intuitional science was always true or sometimes true. Have you ever used it to form a belief which you subsequently rejected due to what you observe 'out there' in the world?
And then there is the question of how widely it applies. It seems that you use it to come up with answers to empirical questions as well as existential questions. Do you use it to formulate your beliefs regarding man's 'natural' diet, or 'ideal' diet?
1) The question about intuitional science is not whether it is always correct or not.
It is always correct but the question is rather different.
You should ask........ARE YOU ABLE TO GET 100% OF INTUITIONAL SCIENCE IN YOUR JUDGEMENT OR NOT?
If i could i would be like God.
The way to the top is long and hard so until you reach the top you are not qualified enough to say that you are able to gather 100%.
I never said that my judgement is 100% correct but at the same time i can say that as you get deeper and deeper into spirituality more and more intuitional consciousness is available to you.
2) To understand how the system works in the diet or anywhere else is not only a question to follow your intuition.
The guru or teacher is also very important.
The teacher in the past did the same hard work that i am doing now before he-she got at the very top so it is also by following his-her teaching that you can progress.
