RE: WHY was Jesus cricified?
July 30, 2014 at 3:18 pm
(This post was last modified: July 30, 2014 at 3:27 pm by Jenny A.)
(July 30, 2014 at 1:16 pm)orangebox21 Wrote:(July 30, 2014 at 12:57 pm)RobbyPants Wrote: and I've already covered that elsewhere, but for sake of this thread, lets assume it counts. Why did it have to happen? By what mechanism does the death of one innocent person atone for the sins of others?
By the very nature of what atonement is.
If ever there was a non-answer, that's it.
Atonement has two meanings: "the reconciliation of God and humankind through the sacrificial death of Jesus Christ"; or "reparation for an offense or injury." http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/atonement The first simply defines atonement as the cruxifiction of Jesus which answers nothing. You might as well say because I said so. The doesn't apply. Jesus' death didn't provide reparations to anyone. Certainly it didn't right any wrongs.
To see how odd this really is consider the following scenario. Jim kills Jane's daughter Anne. The judges orders Jim executed in the criminal case, and awards Jane $100,000 of Jim's estate in the civil case. Looks like reparations to me.
But on appeal the Appellate Judge decides to execute his own son as atonement for all the defendants past and present (not just Jim). The son, who's a little soft in the head agrees. The son is electrocuted after have been beaten. The Appellate Judge lets Jim go, and reverses the award of damage.
How is the crucifixion different?
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god. If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.