refuting misconceptions:1-women in Islam

[mo3taz3nbar]

@ Arms when you have a book claiming to be a divine from god u have to analyse the book itself not to start assuming stuff about someone who lived 1400 years ago (especially when you dont assume credability of the history and i also prefer not to depend on history books in the begining of looking to any religion) you have the book that you can prove from wether this is from god or not.
(thats not the subject)

---

Have you done the research? If so than present me hard evidence that there is a copy of the quran that can be dated back to the seventh century. Such evidence is lacking. Moreover amongst scholars there is considerable doubt and skepticism on the historicity of the texts now in the quran. Basically there are two schools of thought: a non-scientific traditional school claiming authenticity, perfect compilation and divine inspiration, and a skeptical school of thought that from available historical evidence argues for a process of collection from multiple sources spun out over a considerable time after the death of the prophet.

i have done that research and i will present it later as for now am preparing to talk about jihad in islam
as i think a lot of you have the wrong idea about this especially after 9\11 after i finish this i will let you guys decide what the next thread be about. so plz strict to the subject i will get to every point in islam that you guys want to know about or have a misconception about it

And guess what? The traditional school of thought departs from the notion that the quran is the word of god revealed to Muhammad, so it must have been preserved to perfection throughout the ages since its deliverance. Of course this is circular. Now where have we seen that before?

lol dont worry i will not prove to you that Quran is preserved by something you dont believe in the first place