(June 1, 2010 at 9:31 am)Paul the Human Wrote: I guess I'd be a 4.5 on that scale. The existence and/or non-existence of god(s) probably cannot be conclusively established, but I am pretty certain that there are none.
(June 1, 2010 at 1:06 pm)Caecilian Wrote: I'm probably around 4.8So what you both meant was '4'.
I think that there are a number of arguments that point towards the impossibility of god, but none of them are entirely conclusive.

I love how people try to create new places on the scale despite the fact it doesn't measure this. Paul invented a new metric of "certainty", whilst Caecilian decided the more arguments you had, the closer to 5 you were

Just to clarify, this scale has 5 points on it. You are one of the 5. It only measures belief and your view on whether the existence of gods can be conclusively established. It doesn't measure the number of arguments, or how certain you are.
@tavarish:
Deism still involves a God, which is why we list it under theism (and explain theism as any concept of God, including the ones you mentioned).