The redneck strike again.

[Little Rik]

Yoga is an ancient technique for exploring things which now come under the heading of psychology. The person who wrote that other article I quoted about Intuitional Science obviously has some idea that it comes under the heading of psychology because he said that intuition is a form of cognition. He also used the term psycho-spiritual.

Humans are stuck in the physical-psycho world therefore it is obvious that the body and the mind are involved when spirituality take place.
When Sarkar explained that the .......the mind becomes apexed, pinnacled........he means that through spirituality you are able to control the mind so the mind stop wondering around and get concentrated allow you to go ahead with spirituality.
A mind that is not concentrate is like a mad monkey running from place to place preventing the concentration.
The psychological factor can not lead to spiritual progress as a hard drive of a computer can not add anything new to what you already add to it but when does not interfere with your concentration it will allow you to perform the spirituality unhindered.
The body too is important to allow you to engaged in spirituality but again like the mind or psychological factor they are not those who are doing the spiritual progress.
They only remove the obstacle that hindered the spiritual progress.

Going by that, Sarkar wasn't concerned about what animals might have got up to in past lives. He taught that animals' lives are dear to them and we should be concerned about their welfare in their current lives.

It wouldn't sound nice to tell that the Jews holocaust was the direct consequence of crimes perpetrated in previous lives by these people or tell that a lovely girl was raped and killed because in previous life she was a man that did the same horrible thing to somebody else.
As you get deep in Sarkar philosophy you may understand a bit better how the system works.
In the meantime try not to rush to quick judgement.

This topic has run for 113 pages. You've had many opportunities to mention Neohumanism and the PCAP organisation but you didn't. Why not?

It is up to you to investigate these issues if you like.
I am not here to preach or to proselytizing.
When you will feel like entering the spiritual world then you will search and search until you will find what will give an answer to your question.

---

Still not an oxymoron. You just can't accept being wrong about anything, can you? That's sad.

Very sad indeed yogini.
You never study Latin nor you understand any of the Latin derivation like Italian, French or Spanish so you haven't got a clue what is the meaning of the word CONTRADICTORY.
In-CONTRO it means meeting.
S-CONTRO means bumping each other head on.
Contra-dittorio (contra-dictory) means two opposed stance.
Now in theory an atheist has got an opposed stance to the believe that God exist but in reality this believe doesn't make any sense.
It is like to say that a drop of water is not attracted to the sun and in this way loosing her individuality.
Of course it is and of course it would be a contradict to say that the sun does not attract the water.
In the same way it is a contradict to say that God does not attract everybody to Him.
If peace of mind would exist in this physical world then we could say that God does not exist as all we need is here but here is not therefore we need to cross the physical-mental border to get that peace of mind and happiness that quench our thirst.
You can put a brake to your believe that God does not exist but that does not make any sense as it wouldn't make any sense for a drop of water to pretend that she is not attracted by the sun.
I understand that philosophy is not part of your mental world but at least don't come out with this garbage and sink even more in the mental smallness in which you already are.