(August 19, 2014 at 3:43 am)revivin Wrote:(August 19, 2014 at 3:41 am)Esquilax Wrote: Given that multiple corroborations form the basis of every other religion too
No other religion has eyewitness testimony in various groups of resurrection.
From a book called "Problems and Materials on Trial Advocacy":
Eyewitness testimony is, at best, evidence of what the witness believes to have occurred. It may or may not tell what actually happened. The familiar problems of perception, of gauging time, speed, height, weight, of accurate identification of persons accused of crime all contribute to making honest testimony something less than completely credible.
Another problem with your "argument" (very loose use of this word, considering all you have done is repeat the same stuff over and over) is that you have failed to demonstrate that the "eyewitness" accounts are exactly that. If I write a few different documents, from the point of view of various people I make up, claiming they saw something happen, then there is no way that they would be accepted as credible. You are claiming these eyewitness testimonies are genuine, so prove that.
If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world. - J.R.R Tolkien
