RE: Brown and the word "robbery".....
August 23, 2014 at 11:44 am
(This post was last modified: August 23, 2014 at 11:49 am by Mister Agenda.)
(August 20, 2014 at 1:05 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote:(August 20, 2014 at 1:01 pm)Brakeman Wrote: So would either of you care to describe a rule to teach to policemen about being attacked while they are armed? Currently the cop is taught that he is not to let an assailant gain control of his weapon, so that any serious attacks on himself are to be met with deadly force.See "necessary force" and "escalation of force". The rules are decent in and of themselves, it's just that people tend to either ignore them or twist them to make any reaction they want seem like the right reaction. Which is why we're supposed to have oversight committees and investigations.
How would you change the rules for cops? What rule should they be taught for violent attacks on themselves?
If you've got your hands on a cop, you've already escalated to the point where the cop has to consider you going for his or her gun, and no time to think it through.
So, is it true that the cop's eyesocket is fractured?
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.