(September 1, 2014 at 5:45 pm)LostLocke Wrote:(September 1, 2014 at 5:15 pm)Tobie Wrote: Also, your argument in the OP fails because you can't define a time relative to "infinity" because infinity is not a number, and there is evidence that the universe has finite age.Pretty much this.
One of the first statements by the OP involving these 'proofs' includes the statement...
"Assuming time is infinite."
.... which is not indicated at all by anything we know about the universe.
Everything we know today currently points to time beginning ~13.7 billion years ago.
I have a feeling the OP won't quite grasp that, but, meh.
Not really our problem is it?
The universe post big bang is finitely old, but as we know nothing about the pre-big bang universe, it may or may not have infinite age. But it is still a faulty assumption.
If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world. - J.R.R Tolkien
