Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 8, 2025, 9:33 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why intelligent design "proofs" are pointless
#4
RE: Why intelligent design "proofs" are pointless
(September 10, 2014 at 10:32 am)Clueless Morgan Wrote: The problem is that by accepting the conclusion of the initial argument you're letting this person get away with murder. You can't simply assert that something that appears designed requires a designer, therefore the designer necessarily exists. You have to demonstrate that something with the appearance of design necessitates a designer, which we have shown, scientifically, is not the case.

Before you do that, you also have to establish how you detect that something appears designed, which is curiously absent, or fallaciously stated in intelligent design arguments. The lazy ID proponent will claim that X just looks designed and so it is, which begs the question because it could equally be true that now there are two categories, one for designed-looking things that are designed and one for those that are natural. A more competent ID-er will argue that complexity equals design, but that too just begs the question as well as providing the unjustified assertion that nothing complex can be natural. Not to mention, in a world where we know evolution happens, complexity is actually the hallmark of circuity, of processes doubling back on themselves to reach their eventual function. In the world we live in simplicity would be the mark of design, as it would demonstrate things evolving greater functionality with fewer "steps" than it should be possible to do so, and even that is an argument from ignorance when you get right down to it.

The truth is, anyone arguing for ID has no way to detect design at all, because they have no point of contrast. In an intelligently designed world everything was designed, and they have no natural occurrences with which to make comparisons. If you believe everything to be designed, how do you pick out any individual thing to be designed specifically? What are the markers of design in a world like that? It can't be complexity or simplicity, as they believe everything, simple or complex, to be intelligently designed.

It's a self refuting position, really.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Why intelligent design "proofs" are pointless - by robvalue - September 10, 2014 at 3:55 am
RE: Why intelligent design "proofs" are pointless - by Esquilax - September 10, 2014 at 11:00 am
RE: Why intelligent design "proofs" are pointless - by Esquilax - September 10, 2014 at 11:21 am
RE: Why intelligent design "proofs" are pointless - by Tonus - September 10, 2014 at 12:16 pm
RE: Why intelligent design "proofs" are pointless - by ShaMan - September 10, 2014 at 11:05 am
RE: Why intelligent design "proofs" are pointless - by robvalue - September 10, 2014 at 11:24 am
RE: Why intelligent design "proofs" are pointless - by robvalue - September 13, 2014 at 7:23 am
RE: Why intelligent design "proofs" are pointless - by fr0d0 - September 13, 2014 at 7:29 am
RE: Why intelligent design "proofs" are pointless - by robvalue - September 13, 2014 at 7:34 am
RE: Why intelligent design "proofs" are pointless - by fr0d0 - September 13, 2014 at 7:52 am
RE: Why intelligent design "proofs" are pointless - by robvalue - September 13, 2014 at 7:57 am
RE: Why intelligent design "proofs" are pointless - by fr0d0 - September 13, 2014 at 8:42 am
RE: Why intelligent design "proofs" are pointless - by robvalue - September 13, 2014 at 8:48 am
RE: Why intelligent design "proofs" are pointless - by fr0d0 - September 13, 2014 at 4:14 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The absurd need for logical proofs for God R00tKiT 225 31189 December 31, 2020 at 7:48 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Intelligent Falling Dundee 9 2151 October 5, 2020 at 1:41 am
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  A Working Draft Design Argument Acrobat 54 9353 October 19, 2019 at 10:28 am
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Intelligent Design (brief overview). Mystic 70 17941 May 9, 2018 at 2:17 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Intelligent (?) Design Minimalist 12 5199 August 21, 2017 at 1:23 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  If God of Abraham is true, then why didnt he use his intelligent design to make a new Roeki 129 58054 July 9, 2017 at 2:11 am
Last Post: Astonished
  Finely-tuned universe wanted: Intelligent Designers need not apply. Time Traveler 38 12076 April 11, 2016 at 9:01 pm
Last Post: Simon Moon
  The stupid "Apex" "design" argument..... Brian37 23 7451 March 4, 2016 at 11:32 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
Video Jesus Christ, A Pointless Sacrifice Mental Outlaw 16 5656 April 5, 2015 at 3:41 pm
Last Post: Pyrrho
Video Intelligent Design, The Designer is Drunk! Mental Outlaw 6 2609 March 15, 2015 at 6:24 pm
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)