What if we're all wrong though?

[tackattack]

---

If you don't like the web slang capitonym (correctly defined by Rhizzo) then how about homonym further deliniated in common language with a capitol first letter.
6 (Ad.1)- Agreed.
7 -Yes atheists pick, Christians pick too. However, from my experience here specifically a lot of athesits deny the good and over emphasize the bad. Even the skeptics annotated Guide to the Bible has a section of Good things in the Bible. As to where in the Bible God is Love

Theists are making the claim involving a god concept, not atheists. Theists should state and define exactly what they mean by it, not atheists. It is true that atheists should verify specifics of the claim made by theists in debate. Practice is that there is no one coherent formulation of theists of the god concept and that in many cases theists "define" it by referring to books like the bible or the quaran. This sloppy behaviour on what theists generally regard as the most basic fact of their lives, invites atheists to a practice of guessing which part of the bible are within the concept in a specific case. I personally hold the position that no coherent concept of god has ever been presented to me and that the god claim makes no sense. Your attempt to "clarify" for me is a glaring example of the many evasive manaouvres theists use to suggest clarity of an ill defined concept.

---

What exactly am I evading or manuvering around so I can directly answer it please pr.

---

What is amusing is ...Well just 'What if Atheists are right?'

THIS is one of the most frustrating and embarrassing things that theists have to deal with...it is something that haunts their subconscious even though they will never articulate it....

There is NO GOD!!

---

I'm sure I already answered this question, I just can't find it. If atheists are right then there's nothing. That's not a big deal a life spent doing good works is a life well spent. It's not a question that "haunts my subconscious" there's nothing I'm "failing to articulate" nor is it "frustrating or embarassing" in the slightest. If athesits are right nothing at all happens and all the hatred and dissent sown was nothing but a detriment to society. Perhaps if there were more apatheists or ignostics we'd make a lot better progresion then who's right and wrong and intolerance on both sides.