RE: Darwin Proven Wrong?
September 12, 2014 at 2:20 pm
(This post was last modified: September 12, 2014 at 3:10 pm by Mister Agenda.)
(September 12, 2014 at 10:02 am)sswhateverlove Wrote:(September 12, 2014 at 8:02 am)Tonus Wrote: "A force." Not "The Force." You seem strangely hung up on this need to give a name and identity (and even additional properties!) to something that is still not fully understood. Are you aware that you are doing this?
I was trying to be funny.
(September 12, 2014 at 8:14 am)Alex K Wrote: Yes, that Tonus says. You tend to give words more magical meaning beyond what scientists actually mean by them, and then voice your doubts about what the scientists allegedly claim about nature.
Your approach involves quite a bit tubular cellulose leftovers from the last harvest.
Spent 3 hours watching Tyson's doc "The Inexplicable Universe" before coming on here. We should probably blame him for my doubts as he insists over and over that scientists know very little about the "truth" of reality with regard to the specific topics I posted about.
BTW, he proposed that "dark matter" should be called "Fred" and "dark energy" should be called "Wilma" or "Barney".
The takeaway message is supposed to be how much we have to learn and how exciting it will be to learn it, not 'current knowledge is unsound'.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.