Oh so yours is, what, by default more correct? Why?
I presume your definition of 'contradiction' is not something that relates to one statement being the polar opposite of another already given?
And you're actually reinforcing the idea that the bible isn't worth the paper it's written on, let alone the word of a celestial being. If the interpretation of a holy book is down entirely to interpretation then what actual good is it?
Remember; don't waste my time. If not even a god is capable of following that very simple instruction, what worth is it?
I presume your definition of 'contradiction' is not something that relates to one statement being the polar opposite of another already given?
And you're actually reinforcing the idea that the bible isn't worth the paper it's written on, let alone the word of a celestial being. If the interpretation of a holy book is down entirely to interpretation then what actual good is it?
Remember; don't waste my time. If not even a god is capable of following that very simple instruction, what worth is it?
Love atheistforums.org? Consider becoming a patreon and helping towards our server costs.