(September 16, 2014 at 12:10 am)Rhythm Wrote: In that entire wall of text, you addressed my question with this and this alone...
Quote:It also makes me question the potential for an intelligent ‘other perspective’ observer,that's it, full stop........but since the question I've been asking you is a very simple "how does any portion of the wall lead you to intelligent design, or a designer, or it's influence" that wall is utterly useless in answering my question (and so is that statement, as it;s just a reassertion of your position). Don't you think? I see we're on to an intelligent "observer" now though, not a designer, or a design, or influence. I don't even see an observer in that wall-o-text, though. If you can't express the process ..but it really doesn't have much to do with what I asked you...so....
With regard to the theoretical perspectives I discussed, my opinion would be that the intelligent designer (that first perspective) would be comprised of the whole of the universe, all of the "mind" and all of the "matter". It's consciousness in every atom experiencing expanded conscious awareness through experience of a reality. It could be assumed that the experience of reality operates similar to our understandings of how holographs and cloud computing work. in this sense the intelligent designer and the designed, the 'influencer' and the influenced, the 'experiencer' and the experienced are all one and the same elements.
To clarify again, the perspective would assume intelligent designer is also the design, the representation and all the influencing variables and outcomes.
