Un-United Kingdom

[Drich]

[quote='Drich' pid='754948' dateline='1411157302']
I think the should allow an unbiased country recount the votes.. Otherwise their will always be lingering questions.

Your input here is staggering....... I wonder how the US would have reacted to that suggestion in 2000?

well mr poopington, in 2000 we were having a scheduled presidential election, and infact has several third party recounts here in the great state of Fl. And, this just for a normal scheduled election. Imagine what steps we would have to take if the confederate states wished to seperate from the union.

I would say it would be handed over to a third party, because neither side would trust the other with the count.

It was a 10% difference, so not that close. The SNP even has the advantage of changing the law on voting age, allowing 16 years olds to vote on the issue, their best performing demographic.

And still it didn't get that close.

which mean 40% of your populace In Scotland is apposed to being under British rule.. Don't look now mr.poopington but countries have been divided even driven to civil war with numbers far less than what turned out to vote independence.
How many times has 'Britain' fought this fight? How many times has it lost?

Honestly, if you're not bothered getting your news from any reliable sources, stick to subjects you know.

Like... Stirring the English pot? Like coming up with cleaver takes on screen names? (Mr Poopington ?)