(September 24, 2014 at 4:41 pm)Lemonvariable72 Wrote: I am sorry but in truth the observation seems to agree mostly with godslayer, and he is saying that this is now feminists define feminism, and I have not seen a feminist that says otherwise. Also you are straw manning his argument with sarcasm, by saying that he said women have allthe rights. He did not say anything about men having non rights just that women have more and I would agree, after all we have no male birth control.
I have to agree with Alex. To claim that women have more rights than men in our society is largely a crock. The only exception I can even think of is in child-custody cases in the event of a divorce. The male birth control issue is more of an R&D matter, not because powerful women are preventing it from happening. And the "well what about the Middle East" argument strikes me as a red herring. We have a way to go. That they have a much longer road ahead of them doesn't diminish our task.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
