RE: Implied BJ on Jesus, atheists support teen.
September 26, 2014 at 1:55 pm
(This post was last modified: September 26, 2014 at 1:58 pm by Heywood.)
(September 26, 2014 at 1:46 pm)Jaysyn Wrote:(September 26, 2014 at 1:39 pm)Heywood Wrote: If private property can be protected against trademark infringement why can't private property be protected against desecration?
Because unless you are specifically referring to cemeteries or US flags, most states don't have desecration laws?
Pennsylvania probably won't have one much longer if the kid decides not to plead out & the ACLU takes his case. The law's language is far too broad as it stands.
Also, how the fuck do you get threatened with two years for a 2nd degree misdemeanor?
I'm pretty sure most states have laws against desecrating corpses.....so I think your claim about desecration laws is wrong. If the kid took a picture of himself simulating a sex act with a corpse I doubt you atheist types would be in an uproar like you are now. Its only because it is the desecration of a religious symbol that you want to give it a pass.
If the kid did take a picture of himself simulating a sex act with Christopher Hitchen's corpse, do you think the ACLU would fight for him if he was being prosecuted?