While I have heard generalizations criticizing thunderfoot, I have not seen any actual citations of misogynistic mis-steps, certainly not a trend in them.
He continued with follow-up videos and comments because of the wave of vitriol aimed at him because he dared pick on the idea's of a cute little girl. Despite his very academic and logical critiques that were not slanderous at all, he was viciously booted by PZ & his buddies from the blogosphere they shared and lately attacked by a twitter campaign. It is the pro-feministic crusaders that are keeping the shit storm flying, not thunderfoot.
The problem with so called "feminism" is not the ideas, but the inability to effectively challenge those ideas without a wave of "chivalric" men running to the rescue to protect women's ideas.
It follows the standard formula:
You can't critique the history of the holocaust without being a "denier."
You can't critique the history of racial inequality without being a "racist."
You can't critique the NRA without being a "gun hatin' liberal."
You can't critique the actions of Israel without being a "anti-semite."
and so on..
We should force ourselves to examine closely all opposing arguments to our world-view to understand the reason and experience that leads others to espouse these ideas and not automatically pigeon hole them into our presupposed prejudices.
He continued with follow-up videos and comments because of the wave of vitriol aimed at him because he dared pick on the idea's of a cute little girl. Despite his very academic and logical critiques that were not slanderous at all, he was viciously booted by PZ & his buddies from the blogosphere they shared and lately attacked by a twitter campaign. It is the pro-feministic crusaders that are keeping the shit storm flying, not thunderfoot.
The problem with so called "feminism" is not the ideas, but the inability to effectively challenge those ideas without a wave of "chivalric" men running to the rescue to protect women's ideas.
It follows the standard formula:
You can't critique the history of the holocaust without being a "denier."
You can't critique the history of racial inequality without being a "racist."
You can't critique the NRA without being a "gun hatin' liberal."
You can't critique the actions of Israel without being a "anti-semite."
and so on..
We should force ourselves to examine closely all opposing arguments to our world-view to understand the reason and experience that leads others to espouse these ideas and not automatically pigeon hole them into our presupposed prejudices.
Find the cure for Fundementia!
