RE: Evidence God Exists: Part II
June 22, 2010 at 9:48 am
(This post was last modified: June 22, 2010 at 9:53 am by Thor.)
(June 22, 2010 at 9:24 am)rjh4 Wrote: Yeah...I figured that. After all you are an atheist. What I would like to know, if you feel like sharing, why do you find it infinitely more plausible? What is your standard for determining what is plausible and what is not?
Plausible - Explanations that involve the natural world.
Implausible - Explanations that involve things outside the natural world.
(June 22, 2010 at 9:36 am)rjh4 Wrote: It sounds like you are saying that "plausibility" by definition excludes the possibility of God. If so, on what grounds do you make such a statement. If not, please clarify what you mean.
"God" is outside the natural world. Plus, there is no evidence to support the existence of this being.
Science flies us to the moon and stars. Religion flies us into buildings.
God allowed 200,000 people to die in an earthquake. So what makes you think he cares about YOUR problems?
God allowed 200,000 people to die in an earthquake. So what makes you think he cares about YOUR problems?
