RE: Rant against anti-atheist agnostics.
September 28, 2014 at 9:58 am
(This post was last modified: September 28, 2014 at 10:00 am by Mudhammam.)
(September 28, 2014 at 9:52 am)Rhythm Wrote: Not really an accurate description of his logic - since some other poor schmuck is paying with his life. If the debt was owed to himself, and the payment was himself - no crucifixion would be required...and I'd be fucking clapping.
If God demands the payment, and it is God who offers himself as the payment (yes, really a poor schmuck whom Christians worship as God), then it's an entirely accurate description.
Also, you're right that crucifixion would not be required... which makes his faith all the more ridiculous and idiotic (I mean "mysterious").
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza