RE: Logical fallacies and concept of a soul
June 23, 2010 at 2:41 am
(This post was last modified: June 23, 2010 at 2:46 am by Samson.)
Rev, just as Jay stated, it's the typical 101 of their argument...
It's the: "We'll throw it around to everyone", but we shouldn't have to mention a name, because I have a degree in English or American History, so that should count for some kind of Scientific background knowledge......LOL
For F's sake, I'm a Chemist and don't have as much credit as some doofball creationist here in the South.....I may not be a Scientist, per se, but at least I recognize the fundamental differences in a world that is claimed to be 6000 years old, and a world that is 4.5 billion......
It's the: "We'll throw it around to everyone", but we shouldn't have to mention a name, because I have a degree in English or American History, so that should count for some kind of Scientific background knowledge......LOL
For F's sake, I'm a Chemist and don't have as much credit as some doofball creationist here in the South.....I may not be a Scientist, per se, but at least I recognize the fundamental differences in a world that is claimed to be 6000 years old, and a world that is 4.5 billion......
Intelligence is the only true moral guide...