I was left confused about Molyneux's position after watching this video. Is he measuring all transgressions against his willingness to shoot somebody over it, or is he saying all transgressions are worth being shot over, or is he saying no transgression is punishable at all and if you disagree you might as well wish to shoot somebody over any transgression no matter the severity?
I get he's against governance, I'm just lost on this shooting thing. Does he suggest replacing government with armed citizens with the power to kill at their own discretion? Or is he suggesting that by removing government, the people will fall in line and form a utopia?
It's funny because any one of these scenarios is wrong.
I get he's against governance, I'm just lost on this shooting thing. Does he suggest replacing government with armed citizens with the power to kill at their own discretion? Or is he suggesting that by removing government, the people will fall in line and form a utopia?
It's funny because any one of these scenarios is wrong.
I can't remember where this verse is from, I think it got removed from canon:
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."
For context, this is the previous verse:
"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."
For context, this is the previous verse:
"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
