(October 7, 2014 at 6:33 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Mainstream Christianity does not consider god to be omnibenevolent. Period lol.
You misunderstand the pope then.
I don't claim flawless knowledge at all. I claim currently inerrant information. And that stands until proven otherwise.
Yes, it does.
No, I didn't.
Yes, you did.
And you've yet to substantiate your claim of inerrant information.
(October 7, 2014 at 6:33 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: I've been here 5 years and seen most of them. All are complete BS. Nothing has come close. Seriously. I'm not talking biased perspective here. I'm looking for fault.
Like I said: That happens when you stay blind to the facts.
(October 7, 2014 at 6:33 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: I explained it again for you. At some point you're going to need to address it. Saying "I don't get it" won't do. To me it's as plain as the nose on your face.
You haven't explained anything - you simply keep repeating that "morality based on assumption of just god is better than morality sans god" - but you haven't proven it yet.
(October 7, 2014 at 6:33 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: It's self explanatory. I'm sorry that you don't get it.
It not self-explanatory. In fact, I regard morality based on absence of any justice in real world to be far superior to your god-based morality.
(October 7, 2014 at 6:33 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: I have no idea, you said it!
genkaus Wrote:The nature of knowledge has no wants. And its your presupposition that full knowledge is logically unknowable.
Do you understand the difference between the logical possibility of full knowledge and the actuality of someone having full knowledge?
