Abiogenesis is impossible

[snowtracks]

And we're so sure of that why..? Because Aristotle said it? Wouldn't the question better be left to physics than philosophy?

Because it happens to agree with Snowy's world view quite nicely.

Of course, he can't actually defend his assertion, and it's been refuted more than once in this thread. His counter to the numerous refutations is to:

• Say "nuh uh!",
  
• change the subject or simply not reply for a while,
  
• wait for everyone to forget, and
  
• assert it all over again!
  

Once it's refuted, repeat.

"There's this rule that nothing can exist without a cause! Therefore, there must be something that breaks that rule, duh!"

Seriously, if you're going to undercut your own premises right away, you might be better off just abandoning that premise.

Yes, I do find it amusing that at least now he's saving us the time of refuting his arguments and doing it himself. It's like express troll-mode, or something.

wrong again. "no effect without a cause, and the effect is never greater than cause". now, go in the corner and repeat 100 times or till you understand. puddles is confused also.