(June 27, 2010 at 2:08 pm)mo3taz3nbar Wrote:(June 27, 2010 at 1:55 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: So your just going to discount any evidence that doesn't agree with your views, I'm not surprised.now you use history and claims from people to be evidence? lol
i still dont see any refutation on any of Paul's very pertinent accusations: he uses both history and your own book to accuse your prophet, now provide evidence that can excuse, or at least explain, the very "evil" behaviour of you prophet