RE: Is nihilism the logical extreme of atheism?
October 12, 2014 at 4:06 pm
(This post was last modified: October 12, 2014 at 4:25 pm by fr0d0.)
Are you saying that the big bang and the singularity (the single point from which the universe emerged) are two different things Chas? Please explain.
(October 12, 2014 at 2:31 pm)genkaus Wrote:Looks the same to me. Perfection doesn't require greater physical composition. Exactly. All the composition that the universe needed to function should have been there from point zero. That supports the continual evolution of everything. There is no evidence of any new substance not intrinsic to this universe.(October 12, 2014 at 12:24 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: When someone repeats what you say, to me that's assent.
Then you must have misread the argument because I didn't repeat what you said.
genkaus Wrote:fr0d0 Wrote:it's still physically impossible to create something more than you physically compose.A greater degree of perfection does not require greater physical composition
(October 12, 2014 at 2:31 pm)genkaus Wrote:You're disputing it without stating your case. Get back to me when you think of something. "Oh no it isn't" might be ok at a pantomime.(October 12, 2014 at 12:24 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: These are indisputable fact.
Yet here I am, disputing them.