Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"

[FatAndFaithless]

Erm What? Do you have an argument why this is justified? And what do you mean by a decision being made through an act?

Yes, I was referring to the Emmanuel Kant's observations concerning acts. I am doubting that someone could be born gay. When the argument is cleared it all comes down to the act. Both sides could argue if a person is born gay or not. However, it really comes down to the act to be considered to be gay or not. Remember, I mentioned the legal considerations also which actually looks at the physical act which is the final determination.

I am doubting that someone could be born heterosexual. When the argument is cleared it all comes down to the act. Both sides could argue if a person is born straight or not. However, it really comes down to the act to be considered to be straight or not.


See how dumb that sounds when you consider the reasoning applied to your own (i assume) sexuality?