(October 25, 2014 at 4:50 pm)trmof Wrote:(October 25, 2014 at 4:43 pm)Chuck Wrote: It is a mark of honesty to start any such discussion by clarifying your own position, rather than by asking leading questions without nailing down your own position so as to be able to slip and slide and never admit defeat.
So what is your stamndard of evidence and why is that satisfactory?
They aren't leading questions, they are simply questions. I never claimed to have any beliefs whatsoever; I'm interested in yours, which you have still failed to state. As this is a polite conversation and not a college debate, there are no winning and losing conditions.
As for my standards of evidence, I have received numerous physical signs from God that he both listens to me and wants me to behave in certain ways, so I have no further requirement for evidence.
What is the standard of evidence you used to evaluate these signs such that you are satisfied not only to regard them them as signs, but signs form a particular diety amongst the infinite number conceivable deities, which in turn is a infinitesimal subset of conceivable forces and entities any all kind that can be imaged to be able to generate these signs?
