(October 28, 2014 at 2:10 pm)Pickup_shonuff Wrote:(October 27, 2014 at 9:51 pm)Drich Wrote: Re-read your own source material brakeman... Too lazy? It says according to what is written in the zoro-ism book, the religion dates to the dates you quoted...You're not saying that the oldest copy of the text we possess means that's when it was written, right? Because that would be really dumb.
That doesn't mean that my source is wrong when it says the oldest zoro book is 4th century...
Do you understand how that works? It's like if you wrote a book today and claimed it was written under the rule Napoleon... Then buried the book, and two thousand years later d-bag diggs it up and dates the content of the book based on what you wrote.
What I am doing is taking the atheist position of 'you can't proove your religion, past its oldest manuscripts. If it's 'dumb' then take it off the Richard Dawkins Arguement card.
