(November 2, 2014 at 4:22 pm)His_Majesty Wrote:(November 2, 2014 at 3:51 pm)Esquilax Wrote: 1. Breaks its own first premise with its conclusion, and is therefore invalid.
The first premise is "Everything that begins to exist has a cause"...which means that things don't just pop in to being uncaused out of nothing.
(gets ready for "virtual particle" spewage)
I seriously doubt you understand virtual particles. Especially when you are wasting our time with quote mines to argue your point when the people you quote disagree with you.