I mean you need hope because there is no evidence - or from your point of view - at least satisfactory evidence. If you really believed you wouldn't need to hope would you?
I don't hope I have stuff that I already know I have for example.
And I don't hope there is or isn't no God because I already don't believe there is one.
Why would you need hope if you already believed?
Do you think the two aren't mutually exclusive - perhaps?
I think that would be more sliding back and forth between the two.
I don't see how I could hope there is no God when I don't believe there is one. I don't need to hope that there isn't or is a God - because I don't believe there is one.
I don't hope I have stuff that I already know I have for example.
And I don't hope there is or isn't no God because I already don't believe there is one.
Why would you need hope if you already believed?
Do you think the two aren't mutually exclusive - perhaps?
I think that would be more sliding back and forth between the two.
I don't see how I could hope there is no God when I don't believe there is one. I don't need to hope that there isn't or is a God - because I don't believe there is one.