RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
November 4, 2014 at 3:29 pm
(November 4, 2014 at 2:53 pm)Heywood Wrote:What makes you think those two are related and not a coincidence?(November 4, 2014 at 2:11 pm)Surgenator Wrote: Parker made a prediction about some kind of radiation. You are the one suggesting it is dark energy.
I don't think dark energy would satisfy the god requirement, unless god never existed before the universe and then slowly got more powerful. The universe is dominated by dark energy now. It was not dominated by dark energy always.
The universe is dominated now by emergent complex structures....this was not so in the past. As emergent complexity took off....so did dark energy.
Quote:I will use Parker Tan's prediction to make another prediction. Dark energy increases in direct proportion to an increase in emergent complexity.I would love to see how you will quantify emergent complexity and find out what it was in the past. Please come up with a method and share it with us.