(November 3, 2014 at 10:40 am)Faith No More Wrote: No, it isn't that simple. I'm just trying to explain it to a simpleton is all.
Word.
(November 3, 2014 at 10:40 am)Faith No More Wrote: BTW, I love the double standard of requiring demonstration of abiogenesis in a lab all while you cling to your religion that isn't able to demonstrate one iota of credible evidence.
I gave evidence.
(November 3, 2014 at 10:40 am)Faith No More Wrote: That's actually naturalism, which despite the rumors, is not a prerequisite for atheism.
If you don't believe that "Goddidit", then you believe that "Naturedidit", and if that makes an atheist a naturalist, if it looks like a duck...
(November 3, 2014 at 10:40 am)Faith No More Wrote: The funny thing is, you're actually a naturalist for 99.9% of your life. I don't imagine that when your car breaks down on the highway that you start looking for invisible spirits or pray that it will fix itself.
I will look to science when I want to learn how a car operates. I will look to supernaturalism when I want to know where the matter that makes up a car comes from.
(November 3, 2014 at 10:40 am)Faith No More Wrote: You just want to deny rules you use on a daily basis for one instance in order to maintain a comforting belief.
Not at all. I go where logic and reason takes me, and it took me on a first class flight to Christian theism.