(November 5, 2014 at 6:31 pm)His_Majesty Wrote:(November 5, 2014 at 4:42 pm)coldwx Wrote: The question was corroboration from other sources. Do you deny that the preservation of the mummy and the examination of the same is not an external corroborating source? Seriously? The mummy itself has been examined by hundreds of "external" sources.
Apparently you are still confused on what "external Egyptian sources" mean, and it is very unfortunate.
(November 5, 2014 at 4:42 pm)coldwx Wrote: The tomb itself was examined by "external" sources.
very unfortunate.
(November 5, 2014 at 4:42 pm)coldwx Wrote: This is not hard. You gave a poor challenge and you were rightly criticized for it. Not admitting you failed on this regard gives the appearance of simply arguing to be a contrarian.
Also, the Amarna letters possibly mentions Tut
Very unfortunate indeed.
You're fucking hilarious. You gave no rebuttal just repeated your aforementioned incredulity over and over. Stick around though, it is humorous watching you get spanked.
"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. "
