(November 5, 2014 at 6:31 pm)His_Majesty Wrote:(November 5, 2014 at 4:42 pm)coldwx Wrote: The question was corroboration from other sources. Do you deny that the preservation of the mummy and the examination of the same is not an external corroborating source? Seriously? The mummy itself has been examined by hundreds of "external" sources.
Apparently you are still confused on what "external Egyptian sources" mean, and it is very unfortunate.
So then you do deny that the numerous scientist's examining Tut's body in the 19th century lived outside Egyptian antiquity? Is that the argument you are sticking with?
"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. "
