RE: Atheism is unreasonable
November 6, 2014 at 1:13 pm
(This post was last modified: November 6, 2014 at 1:14 pm by Surgenator.)
(November 5, 2014 at 6:13 pm)His_Majesty Wrote:(November 5, 2014 at 4:25 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: A hypothesis is potentially falsifiable, by definiton. Whatever God may be, a hypothesis it certainly isn't.
The God hypothesis can be falsified. If you postulate a God that is based on a logically incoherent concept...that makes that God false.
What other method can we falsify God or is this the only way to falsify God? If I define an internally consistent God, does that make him exist?
For something to exist, internal consistency is necessary but it is not sufficient. If you claim there is no way to falsify an interally consistent definition of God, then your God claim is similiar to the orbiting-tea-pot claim.