Hi, I'm the Godhead

[theVOID]

Void -

Now you're resorting to namecalling, just because I don't agree with you. Charming.

It wasn't an insult, it was a description.

I do not consider you intellectually spineless because you disagree with me, I consider you that because you absolutely refuse to attempt to address the obvious critical flaws in your reasoning, show no care for the potentially unlimited number of contradictory conclusions that can be obtained using the standard of evidence that you defined yourself and use in reaching your own conclusion, show no interest in explaining why you think your conclusion is more valid than the other conclusions, instead rationalising it using the exact same standard that lead to all these contradictory conclusions in the first place, and yet you still claim to give a fuck about determining the truth of your beliefs....

Trichotomy: You're either dishonest, stupid or both.

---

For what purpose would someone have to defend what they believe? Defend against what? What is under attack, and does it feel threatened?

Don't people only defend things which they feel are jeapordised by something else?

The privileged of being considered intellectually honest, and therefore the right to claim that you give a shit about the truth, is under attack.