Atheism is unreasonable

[His_Majesty]

What other method can we falsify God or is this the only way to falsify God? If I define an internally consistent God, does that make him exist?

If the God that you define is internally consistent, that would make "his" existence POSSIBLE. But whether or not this entity actually exists, that would depend on something else.

For something to exist, internal consistency is necessary but it is not sufficient. If you claim there is no way to falsify an interally consistent definition of God, then your God claim is similiar to the orbiting-tea-pot claim.

Well, we are talking about the distinction between necessary existence, and contingent existence...the "god" could be internally consistent, but its existence could be actually false.

---

well, the fact that all life on earth, and virii. -- which consist of nothing but an RNA strand -- use the same five amino bases is a good sign that they have a common origin; and consider how primitive a virus is, it seems that abiogenetic selection is indicated. Furthermore, we've observed simple RNA evolve into comle, strands, meaning that chemical evolution has been observed. The obvious interpretation is that RNA evolved from precursor molecules ... Perhaps we'll see this in the lab one day.

As far as the "biobabble", it's pretty easy to grasp. You ought to check it out some time.

Finally, it'll be interesting to see the changes in your viewpoint once you apply this apparent thirst for evidence to your own premises.

Cart before the horse fallacy. Where did the amino acids come from?

---

Maj, do you think there could exist anything, any kind of evidence, which might possibly change your views on this subject?

On what subject? We are talking about lots of subjects mannnn