Atheism is unreasonable

[His_Majesty]

Dude, you're doing it wrong.
At least WLC tries to understand the science and find loopholes in it to shoehorn in a god....
You..., on the other hand... you ignore the science whenever it doesn't agree with your preconception of god and then ask for things like this:

This is just dumb and stupid. It may work on some uneducated americans, I'll grant you that.... yahoo chat rooms, huh? those pre-4-chan halls of troll and ignorance?

Still much to learn, you have, young one.

Okey dokey.

---

Fuckin' hell, you're older than me and you're this bad at forming a cogent argument?

Well, just take these intellectual spankings as a good old fashioned case of the elder putting the youngster in his place.

If your god does exist, he is no doubt embarrassed at the lies you've told, about evolution, about atheism, about so much more, in order to come to his "defense". Why does he even need defending from someone like you, anyway? Can't he fight his own battles?

Evolution is the lie I am speaking against...and don't worry, during the Armageddon and on judgment day, God will be definitely fighting his own battles.

---

Every single post that has rebutted your repeated assertions in this thread.

That would depend...if you think bad rebuttals are still rebuttals, then yes, many of my posts have been rebutted

You mean your 'nuh-uh' rebuttal where you convincingly argued that the exodus as biblically Stated has an element of truth to it (by virtue of the dismissal of the evidence that suggests it never happened)?

There is no evidence which suggests it never happened, and if there is, I haven't seen it yet.

The issue you have with garnering all your information about topics like evolution from apologist websites is that its always wrong.

Always?

'Dogs only have dogs.' I mean come the fuck along. Remember a few lines ago where I said your posts showed that your knew nothing about the topics you're talking about?

It is the truth!!! Dogs produce dogs...in other words I am saying that animals only produce what they are, not what they aren't. Unless you can prove otherwise, I don't understand why we are even having this discussion.

One of your main fallicious arguments in this thread has been Kalam and variants thereof.

1. Everything that begins to exist has a cause
2. The universe began to exist
3. Therefore, the universe has a cause

Problem?

The lack of evidence for anything in exodus being even remotely accurate is evidence for it being false (as above, no Jewish exodus from Egypt, no visit to Mt Sinai.

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. If that is the case, abiogenesis is false on the fact that there isn't any evidence for it.

The fact that you think Moses lived to be hundreds and hundreds of years old speaks volumes.

I don't believe that Moses lived to be hundreds and hundreds of years old...I believe that he lived to be 123 yrs old, just like the Bible says...and judging by the fact that the oldest person alive today is 116 yrs old...I don't think an age of 123 is to far fetched.

Tell us again about all these years you've spent researching topics and refining your arguments?

What do you wanna know?

You've made, what,40 odd posts thus far and what have you contributed; the same old tired apologist nonsense we've all heared and debunked time and time again. Change the channel already.

You haven't debunked anything until you can prove how infinity can be traversed, how life can come from nonlife, and how consciousness can come from unconsciousness.

Until then, all bark, no bite.

Is there someone else we can talk to? A theist who knows what he's doing?

Don't know why you are looking for someone else..weren't you just complaining about the same stuff being presented? Yet, now you are asking for someone else? Well, what would be the difference if another theist comes in here? The same arguments will be presented.

The only difference will come in the actual DEFENSE of the argument. You may be used to being able to just walk all over theists who may not be as familiar with the arguments/defenses against the arguments.

Sorry Charlie, that ain't me.