RE: Atheism is unreasonable
November 11, 2014 at 11:50 am
(This post was last modified: November 11, 2014 at 11:52 am by His_Majesty.)
(November 10, 2014 at 3:48 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: Yes. Christian dogma is that not believing in the Christian god dooms one to Hell.
Well, if the Christian God doesn't exist, you really don't have anything to worry about, do you?
(November 10, 2014 at 3:48 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: Are you not reading what you write? You wrote: "I don't think omnibenovelence necessarily entails omni-mercifulness." That means that you're saying that you don't necessarily think that your god is perfectly merciful.
Which I don't.
(November 10, 2014 at 3:48 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: Myself, I don't believe in any gods, which means that I believe this about myself freely.
Then you have free will.
(November 10, 2014 at 3:48 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: You, on the other hand, believe in a God who knows everything, who made everything, and who has a Plan. Based on those premises, you must logically believe that your god has made me the way that I am.
If God exists, he isn't forcing you to believe, and if he doesn't exist, you aren't being forced to believe...so either way, the choice is yours.
(November 10, 2014 at 3:48 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: As has already been pointed out to you, free will and an omnimax god are contradictory.
What the heck is omnimax?
(November 10, 2014 at 3:48 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: Well, so much for your merciful god, then.
He is merciful, he just isn't omni-merciful, which is something that you erraneously think that he should be...despite it not being a necessary ingredient of benevolence.
(November 10, 2014 at 3:48 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: If worms had machine guns, birds wouldn't fuck with them.
They would if they had tanks.
(November 10, 2014 at 3:48 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: So you claim.
It is called "Christian theology".
(November 10, 2014 at 3:48 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: Yet you cannot provide one shred of evidence for this god-thingy, nor can you even coherently define him, nor can you reconcile the internal contradictions of the god you whimsically worship.
I did coherently define him, and all you can do is come up with some mickey mouse objection, objections that were shut down.
(November 10, 2014 at 3:48 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: Remind me again why I should give two shits rubbed together about your opinions.
On judgement day, you will definitely be reminded why you SHOULD have gave two shits...and you won't be reminded by me, but by God.
(November 10, 2014 at 3:48 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: Climb down off the cross, kid. You're no prophet.
Did I say I was?
(November 10, 2014 at 3:48 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: No. They've been dissected page after page, just like any other AiG boilerplate, and just like every other Christian troll I've ever seen, you're either too stupid to see it, or to dishonest to admit it.
They've been dissected?

(November 10, 2014 at 3:48 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: There's no law of nature that say life can't come from nonlife and consciousness from unconsciousness. Your basis for asserting it's not possible seems to rest entirely on you not wanting it to be true.
Either way, it hasn't been scientifically proven.