RE: Time..
November 12, 2014 at 12:53 am
(This post was last modified: November 12, 2014 at 1:00 am by Thumpalumpacus.)
(November 11, 2014 at 7:36 pm)lifesagift Wrote:(November 11, 2014 at 7:20 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: "Get over" myself? This from the guy who expresses disappointment in online strangers because they don't use the same words he does?FFS mate... one chance, one life... really.. you want a row? dear oh dear !!
Pot, kettle, etc etc.
If you don't want a row, don't take a tilt, that's what I say.
(November 11, 2014 at 11:06 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: I miss David Tennant as the Doctor
He was interviewed on NPR tonight. I've never watched the show, but he seemed like an extraordinary guy.
(November 11, 2014 at 8:00 pm)Stimbo Wrote: I've always regarded time as the first dimension (inasmuch as you can enumerate dimensions meaningfully), since it must permeate every other dimension.
A fair correction. It's embarrassing that I should be brought up short so efficiently -- time and groove are the most important and basic parts of musicianship.
But I will confess to being visually oriented as well, and for me that means that the spatial dimensions and relationships are always near the front of my mind. It works for me, because often when I write and record songs I will use visual analogies to construct the piece.
A simple form of synesthesia, perhaps.
