Atheism is unreasonable

[Surgenator]

---

No dumbass, 2+2=4 is necessarily true.

If something is necessarily true, then it is POSSIBLE for it to be necessarily true...becuz if it weren't possible, then it wouldnt be actually true...dumbass.

A possibility refers when there are multiple outcomes. A necessarily refers to when there is one outcome.

If there is only one outcome, then that is one POSSIBLE outcome, becuz if weren't possible, it wouldn't be an outcome, oh stupid one.

For example, when you buy coffee at a coffee shop, you have a possibility of ordering a Latte, but it is necessary to pay for your order.

Bullcrap. It isn't necessary to pay for my order, I could pull out a gun and stick the place up and get them for all of there Latte's, and not pay for anything.

---

I was assuming you didn't want to be a criminal, but that was too much for you. Plus, arguing this point is waste of my time.

Since this is the only point of mine you responded to, I assume you couldn't counter my others. Do you now believe that self-replicating molecules exist?

Don't know, don't care. It is irrelevant to where did DNA come from and the fact that science can't tell us anything regarding origins.

You finally state your dishonesty, your lack of knowledge, and add a blatant assertion without anything to back it up. Do you wonder why people laugh at you?

Do you now believe that consciousness can arise from unconsciousness or do I have explain how babys are made, again?

No. Explain to me how consciousness first originated..then you will be talking some good shit.

I don't think you'll listen if I did. You clearly stated your dishonesty above. And you haven't explained anything but spout assertions without backup.

Did you find an abiogenesis step that would be considered impossible? Finally, do you now believe that abiogenesis has a higher likelihood for the origin of life than god?

No and no.

So you can't find any step that you consider impossible for abiogenesis, yet you say it is impossible?

So abiogenesis is a possible explanation for the origin of life that uses natural means, but somehow a supernatural-external-semiintelligent being is more likely? So if you can't find your socks one day, do you think a supernatural sock theif took them is more likely than you misplacing them? Because misplacing them would be the natural explanation, but you think super natural ones are more likely.