RE: Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
November 14, 2014 at 12:30 pm
(This post was last modified: November 14, 2014 at 12:44 pm by Exian.)
His Majesty's tactic seems to be what ever the opposite is of the Gish Gallop and word salad. Leave your opponent clinging on to the skin of your argument's teeth.
Well done, Esq., on working with what you had.
I had the same thought. He wants evidence of "macroevolution", claiming it's accepted on blind faith, then asserts some boundary on kinds changing kinds without evidence to back the claim.
I wonder if he would agree that grass and corn are "two different kinds".
http://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/selection/corn/
Well done, Esq., on working with what you had.
(November 14, 2014 at 12:17 pm)JuliaL Wrote: I'm looking forward to HM putting forth evidence that his claimed limits to divergence between 'kinds' exist.
I had the same thought. He wants evidence of "macroevolution", claiming it's accepted on blind faith, then asserts some boundary on kinds changing kinds without evidence to back the claim.
I wonder if he would agree that grass and corn are "two different kinds".
http://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/selection/corn/
I can't remember where this verse is from, I think it got removed from canon:
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."
For context, this is the previous verse:
"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."
For context, this is the previous verse:
"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
