Atheism is unreasonable

[Fidel_Castronaut]

Liar, and not a very good one at that.

Man please. I didn't lie about anything. What the hell is there for me to lie for?

Bracketing out the very obvious lack of credentials on any and every subject you've sought to discredit on here, the lie where you agreed to abide by the T&Cs of the debate (which, contrary to what you've posted below, are standardized and ubiquitous to formal debates IRL and online - and I've actually bee to quite a few at various universities where I've studied so you can't bullshit your way around that) and then proceeded to completely disregard them.

The rules were set out for you to both to follow in a standard format - opening statement, rebuttals, conclusion. Simple. It's a standard format used in almost every formal debate.

Actually, it isn't simple. In my apologetic journey I've watched DOZENS upon DOZENS of debates and this is the only debate I've known to have participants RESPOND to opening statements separately from the main presentations.

In WLC debates and the other dozens that I've seen, in the opening statement is where you PRESENT your material...all of that other crap is unwarranted and a waste of time.

Again, demonstrably bullshit. The format of formal debates is standardized. Go to any university or debating hall and you'll get a similar or variant of what was agreed between you and Esquilax.

And it's funny that you should trot out WLC. I'm actually doing my PhD at the same university where WLC gained his own PhD here in England and I can tell you 100% that debates between student societies and internal/external presenters are in a similar format to the one employed here. And I know he participated in debates on apologetics here. So again, stop talking shit.

Only evidences further to me that your academic credentials are zero, and thus your (often bizarre) views on the very academic subjects you seek to discredit can be dismissed.

Seems like the only good thing you can do is present the worse possible case for espousing your particular form of Christian apologetics.

It isn't a particular form, it is the same arguments that have been argued for the past century by Christian apologetics, and I've yet to see you even attempt to refute anything...all you've done is bitch and moan..which itself isn't worth to much of anything as far as I'm concerned.

I bitch and moan when idiots like you give me things to bitch and moan about.

Thus, stop being stupid, post something that has some substance, and maybe people will take you seriously. Until then, you're just another anonymous goon on the Internet with a penchant for hoarding incorrect information on subjects you don't know anything about from apologist websites and presenting them like you've got something to say. Really weird how you guys come onto atheist forums like you've got something to prove over subjects like evolution and then proceed to make utter fools of yourself.

Someone mentioned the dunning Kruger effect before.