the stars

[Heywood]

There need to be no compelling argument against a word the means nothing, masqurading through the use of various fallacies as a concept that could somehow "exist". The vacuousness of God is compelling enough.

The concept of God obviously has meaning to theist(and probably most atheists) even if is has no meaning to you. The argument presented in the OP was directed at the conception of God that theists and most atheists take it to mean at least in a general sense.

You're not really presenting a rebuttal to my counter argument. Instead you trying to steer the conversation toward the meaning of God rather than does the vastness or reality say anything about God's existence.