(November 16, 2014 at 5:35 pm)pocaracas Wrote: We're calling for the hammer, now?
That's what they want. Let him break the rules first.... blatantly.
I am. I don't have a mouse in my pocket, though.
I rarely make such a call, but in this case, I regard his posts as a form of custom spam -- he might answer this or that post, but he's got canned answers that are obviously incoherent cut-and-paste, in an attempt to muddy and not clarify a discussion so that it might go on longer and thus afford further opportunity for preaching.
If blatant dishonesty (i.e. agreeing to have read and understood the rules of a debate, only to violate them and admit to not reading them) is not against the rules, it ought to be.