(November 16, 2014 at 8:57 pm)IATIA Wrote: Do you have any proof
"I think, therefore I am" or any semblance thereof is proof of nothing.
The hard problem of solipsism has had no human solution nor have I seen any convincing argument that it does not apply to God. Hence my sig.
We generally choose to ignore it and carry on with our lives as if it doesn't exist. This is pragmatism and appears to be without penalty.
But ignoring it does not give license to make alternative claims (I am god but forgot to make the payments) without evidence thereof.
(November 16, 2014 at 5:20 pm)IATIA Wrote:(November 16, 2014 at 4:21 pm)JuliaL Wrote: "GAME OVER, TO CONTINUE, INSERT ANOTHER QUARTER IN 10....9....8"
god: "hey Peter, check this shit out! Whoosh! Flooded all them critters."
Peter: "Cool. How about this ..."
Why bring in iron age fictional characters (e.g. Peter, god)?
Be aware, "revealed truth" is synonymous with "made up stuff."
It's more likely to be, "Hey! Mario! Look at all the gorillas throwing flaming barrels!"
.
So how, exactly, does God know that She's NOT a brain in a vat?